Skip to main content

Vulkro vs the incumbents

You don't need a vendor in your repo.

Some need your source on their servers. Others paywall the heavyweight rules. All charge by developer head and auto-bill forever. Vulkro is the inverse: one CLI, one machine, $19 a month or $149 a year, you choose when to renew.

Compared against products like Snyk Code, Semgrep, SonarQube, Bearer, Veracode, Checkmarx, and Codacy.

Apples to apples.

12 categories, 4 tools, public benchmark numbers. "n/a" means the competitor does not publish on that category.

VulkroSnyk CodeSemgrepSonarQube
Runs on your machineYesNo (cloud-only)YesYes
Source code stays localYesNoYesYes
TelemetryNoneYes, mandatoryOptional, on by defaultOptional, on by default
AI model in the scannerNoneYes (DeepCode AI)NoneNone
Account requiredNoneYesNoneNone
Per-developer pricingFree, or $19 once, per machine~$25/dev/mo+Free / $40/dev/mo paidFree / $150/dev/yr paid
Known bugs caught (of 55)42n/a12n/a
Accuracy score (catch vs noise)0.68n/a0.32n/a
Compliance frameworks94None native3
Benchmark + methodology publicYes (reproducible)NoPartialNo
Output formats13454
Auto-renewalNone (you renew manually)Yes (auto-billed)YesYes

Three categories, three trade-offs.

Each card says what the category gives up, and what they do better than us. Honest beats hyperbole.

Cloud scanners

Source-on-their-servers is the model.

Cloud scanners need your source on their servers to scan it. Pricing scales with how many developers push code: the more you ship, the more they earn. If you are comfortable putting your codebase on someone else's infrastructure, a polished cloud product is the polished option. Vulkro starts from the assumption that you are not.

Honest Where they win: IDE plugins from better-funded vendors are nicer. Vulkro has a working editor integration, but the polish is not there yet.

Open-source scanners

The heavyweight rules sit behind a paywall.

Open-source community editions are real tools, limited on purpose. The rules that catch broken access control, the harder injection bugs, cross-file data flow, and most of the OWASP API top 10 are paywalled. The free editions catch between 22% and 45% of known bugs. The paid tiers start at $40 per developer per month. Vulkro ships the equivalent of "Pro" rules for $19, with no auto-renewal.

Honest Where they win: Semgrep has the gold standard for writing your own custom rules. Vulkro detectors are compiled, so you cannot author one without us shipping it.

Code-quality + security

Security was the afterthought.

Code-quality platforms started as linters, complexity meters, and code-smell catchers. Security was bolted on later, and the security-focused rules are mostly in paid editions starting around $150 per developer per year. The free editions do not include cross-file data flow or framework-aware route analysis.

Honest Where they win: cyclomatic complexity, duplicate-code detection, formatting, code-smell heuristics. SonarQube and Codacy do those well. We do not. We do security.

Switching from one of these?

Pick your current tool. Get a one-line replacement for each common workflow.

Same workflow, no upload.

Snyk Code workflowVulkro equivalent
snyk code testvulkro scan .
Snyk PR checkvulkro scan . --since main --format gh-pr
Snyk SARIF exportvulkro scan . --format sarif
Snyk container scanvulkro container <image>

Run both. See what each one finds.

Don't take the table at face value. Install Vulkro, run it on the same project your current scanner already covers, and compare what each one reports. Our public benchmark automates the comparison if you want a numeric answer.